forgejo/discussions
49
43

Contributor label for professional service providers #476

Open
opened 2026年06月11日 20:56:45 +02:00 by fnetX · 0 comments
Owner
Copy link

Although slowly, the list of professional service providers for Forgejo grew over the past years, and I hope to encourage more listings there. However, the list is currently quite noisy in my eyes.

I suggest that people on the list can "apply" via the normal process in Forgejo to receive a "Contributor" label. The Forgejo community gets to evaluate if the contributions back to the project are significant enough to warrant it. The label expires after one year, similar to team memberships.

I hope that this would allow users to know which service providers give back to the community; and indirectly also encourages providers to contribute back in order to receive the label.

What do you think?

Although slowly, the [list of professional service providers for Forgejo](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues) grew over the past years, and I hope to encourage more listings there. However, the list is currently quite noisy in my eyes. I suggest that people on the list can "apply" via the normal process in Forgejo to receive a "Contributor" label. The Forgejo community gets to evaluate if the contributions back to the project are significant enough to warrant it. The label expires after one year, similar to team memberships. I hope that this would allow users to know which service providers give back to the community; and indirectly also encourages providers to contribute back in order to receive the label. What do you think?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
No results found.
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
User research - Accessibility
Requires input about accessibility features, likely involves user testing.
User research - Blocked
Do not pick as-is! We are happy if you can help, but please coordinate with ongoing redesign in this area.
User research - Community
Community features, such as discovering other people's work or otherwise feeling welcome on a Forgejo instance.
User research - Config (instance)
Instance-wide configuration, authentication and other admin-only needs.
User research - Errors
How to deal with errors in the application and write helpful error messages.
User research - Filters
How filter and search is being worked with.
User research - Future backlog
The issue might be inspiring for future design work.
User research - Git workflow
AGit, fork-based and new Git workflow, PR creation etc
User research - Labels
Active research about Labels
User research - Moderation
Moderation Featuers for Admins are undergoing active User Research
User research - Needs input
Use this label to let the User Research team know their input is requested.
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
Research on how users should know what to do next.
User research - Rendering
Text rendering, markup languages etc
User research - Repo creation
Active research about the New Repo dialog.
User research - Repo units
The repo sections, disabling them and the "Add more" button.
User research - Security
User research - Settings (in-app)
How to structure in-app settings in the future?
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
forgejo/discussions#476
Reference in a new issue
forgejo/discussions
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?