dnkl/foot
41
2.0k
Fork
You've already forked foot
243

Foot doesnt work woth powerlevel10k instant prompt properly #558

Closed
opened 2021年05月27日 09:44:37 +02:00 by ibrokemypie · 2 comments

I use the zsh theme powerlevel10k which has an instant prompt functionality. Additionally I print my zsh init time when zsh is started. This results in the following most of the time when starting foot (in sway if that matters)
image
image

When it should (and does in other terminals) look like this
image

This doesnt happen 100% of the time and isn't a major issue, but it happens most of the time and is a minor annoyance that I can't reproduce in other terminals I use.

I use the zsh theme powerlevel10k which has an instant prompt functionality. Additionally I print my zsh init time when zsh is started. This results in the following most of the time when starting foot (in sway if that matters) ![image](/attachments/3ca05c64-4416-44f1-8769-7c698a213b21) ![image](/attachments/4a21fcdf-956e-455d-9b98-a636677b4029) When it should (and does in other terminals) look like this ![image](/attachments/38b5d7f0-fa4f-41f4-a576-185ca970ff34) This doesnt happen 100% of the time and isn't a major issue, but it happens most of the time and is a minor annoyance that I can't reproduce in other terminals I use.
Owner
Copy link

Duplicate of #195, and #265.

To fix this, either the shell needs to handle early terminal window resizes better, or we need to implement the "wait-for-mapped" workaround mentioned in #453.

And, fwiw, other terminals are affected by this. See for example https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/1616

Duplicate of https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/195, and https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/265. To fix this, either the shell needs to handle early terminal window resizes better, or we need to implement the "wait-for-mapped" workaround mentioned in https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/453. And, fwiw, other terminals _are_ affected by this. See for example https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/1616
Owner
Copy link

foot may be more susceptible because it both starts up very fast, and is very aggressive about starting the shell as early as possible.

foot may be more susceptible because it both starts up **very** fast, **and** is very aggressive about starting the shell as early as possible.
dnkl 2021年05月28日 17:46:31 +02:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    duplicate
    label
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
master
osc-5522
sixel-heap-buffer-overflow
releases/1.27
releases/1.26
releases/1.25
releases/1.24
multi-cursor
releases/1.23
pixman-16f-2
releases/1.22
releases/1.21
releases/1.20
releases/1.19
releases/1.18
releases/1.17
releases/1.16
releases/1.15
releases/1.14
releases/1.13
releases/1.12
releases/1.11
releases/1.10
releases/1.9
releases/1.8
releases/1.7
releases/1.6
releases/1.5
releases/1.4
releases/1.3
releases/1.2
releases/1.1
releases/1.0
1.27.0
1.26.1
1.26.0
1.25.0
1.24.0
1.23.1
1.23.0
1.22.3
1.22.2
1.22.1
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.2
1.20.1
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.1
1.18.0
1.17.2
1.17.1
1.17.0
1.16.2
1.16.1
1.16.0
1.15.3
1.15.2
1.15.1
1.15.0
1.14.0
1.13.1
1.13.0
1.12.1
1.12.0
1.11.0
1.10.3
1.10.2
1.10.1
1.10.0
1.9.2
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.2
1.8.1
1.8.0
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.4
1.6.3
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.4
1.5.3
1.5.2
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.0
1.2.3
1.2.2
1.2.1
1.2.0
1.1.0
1.0.0
0.9.0
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
dnkl/foot#558
Reference in a new issue
dnkl/foot
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?