dnkl/foot
41
2.0k
Fork
You've already forked foot
243

The bold-text-in-bright option is not applied correctly to selected text and backgrounds #1836

Open
opened 2024年09月12日 14:18:10 +02:00 by rozhur · 1 comment

Foot Version

foot version: 1.13.1 +pgo +ime +graphemes -assertions

TERM environment variable

xterm-256color

Compositor Version

sway version 1.7

Description of Bug and Steps to Reproduce

The bold-text-in-bright option does not work correctly for selected text and backgrounds, making the text difficult to read:
2024年09月12日_16-57-42-284.png

I changed the following code in render.c:

there where (https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/src/branch/master/render.c#L763)

 if (term->conf->bold_in_bright.enabled && cell->attrs.bold)
 _fg = color_brighten(term, _fg);

I replaced it with

 if (term->conf->bold_in_bright.enabled && cell->attrs.bold) {
 if (cell->attrs.reverse ^ is_selected) {
 _bg = color_brighten(term, _bg);
 } else {
 _fg = color_brighten(term, _fg);
 }
 }

Now:
latest.png

Relevant logs, stacktraces, etc.

No response

### Foot Version foot version: 1.13.1 +pgo +ime +graphemes -assertions ### TERM environment variable xterm-256color ### Compositor Version sway version 1.7 ### Description of Bug and Steps to Reproduce The `bold-text-in-bright` option does not work correctly for selected text and backgrounds, making the text difficult to read: ![2024年09月12日_16-57-42-284.png](/attachments/8d0277c8-1073-4062-8ad9-78bfdf4fc3e4) I changed the following code in `render.c`: there where (https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/src/branch/master/render.c#L763) ``` if (term->conf->bold_in_bright.enabled && cell->attrs.bold) _fg = color_brighten(term, _fg); ``` I replaced it with ``` if (term->conf->bold_in_bright.enabled && cell->attrs.bold) { if (cell->attrs.reverse ^ is_selected) { _bg = color_brighten(term, _bg); } else { _fg = color_brighten(term, _fg); } } ``` Now: ![latest.png](/attachments/7522a19b-a180-49e0-8e47-f77c26b8f179) ### Relevant logs, stacktraces, etc. _No response_

Thanks, very much! I am affected by this as well.

Thanks, very much! I am affected by this as well.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
master
osc-5522
sixel-heap-buffer-overflow
releases/1.27
releases/1.26
releases/1.25
releases/1.24
multi-cursor
releases/1.23
pixman-16f-2
releases/1.22
releases/1.21
releases/1.20
releases/1.19
releases/1.18
releases/1.17
releases/1.16
releases/1.15
releases/1.14
releases/1.13
releases/1.12
releases/1.11
releases/1.10
releases/1.9
releases/1.8
releases/1.7
releases/1.6
releases/1.5
releases/1.4
releases/1.3
releases/1.2
releases/1.1
releases/1.0
1.27.0
1.26.1
1.26.0
1.25.0
1.24.0
1.23.1
1.23.0
1.22.3
1.22.2
1.22.1
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.2
1.20.1
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.1
1.18.0
1.17.2
1.17.1
1.17.0
1.16.2
1.16.1
1.16.0
1.15.3
1.15.2
1.15.1
1.15.0
1.14.0
1.13.1
1.13.0
1.12.1
1.12.0
1.11.0
1.10.3
1.10.2
1.10.1
1.10.0
1.9.2
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.2
1.8.1
1.8.0
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.4
1.6.3
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.4
1.5.3
1.5.2
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.0
1.2.3
1.2.2
1.2.1
1.2.0
1.1.0
1.0.0
0.9.0
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
dnkl/foot#1836
Reference in a new issue
dnkl/foot
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?