Codeberg/Documentation
42
199
Fork
You've already forked Documentation
161

Add CI section #237

Merged
fnetX merged 4 commits from add_ci-site into main 2022年07月17日 23:48:11 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link
close https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI/feedback/issues/44
Author
Contributor
Copy link

@mray do you know a nice icon for the new CI section ?

@mray do you know a nice icon for the _new_ CI section ?
Owner
Copy link

Who added that link in the first place? Why add a link when the target doesn't yet exist?!

Who added that link in the first place? Why add a link when the target doesn't yet exist?!

Who added that link in the first place? Why add a link when the target doesn't yet exist?!

#214 You authored the PR.

> Who added that link in the first place? Why add a link when the target doesn't yet exist?! https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/214 You authored the PR.
Owner
Copy link

I meant the link in the Woodpecker navbar.

I meant the link in the Woodpecker navbar.
Owner
Copy link

I think this also requires a redirect?

I think this also requires a redirect?
First-time contributor
Copy link

What is the icon needed for? What does it have to do? How do other icons that are used for the same thing look like?

What is the icon needed for? What does it have to do? How do other icons that are used for the same thing look like?
@ -0,0 +2,4 @@
eleventyNavigation:
key: CI
title: Working with Codeberg's CI
icon: ci
Author
Contributor
Copy link

that

that
6543 marked this conversation as resolved

How do other icons that are used for the same thing look like?

Gitlab:
image

Github:
image

> How do other icons that are used for the same thing look like? Gitlab: ![image](/attachments/7425b062-27c7-4294-aaac-b151ccbba207) Github: ![image](/attachments/431f2339-c109-4c4e-9c8e-5567b72b5fa1)
1.5 KiB
1.7 KiB
Owner
Copy link

For the record, we used
image
for the org. So something in this style might also fit very well.

For the record, we used ![image](https://codeberg.org/avatars/cb2686011bd1631e58f4bcb1a6e04991) for the org. So something in this style might also fit very well.
First-time contributor
Copy link

I see. So it needs to be one color and fit to the icons in those top tabs right?

image

I see. So it needs to be one color and fit to the icons in those top tabs right? ![image](/attachments/02af968d-c9ae-406a-aee9-9e829bdfe98e)
9.9 KiB

I see. So it needs to be one color and fit to the icons in those top tabs right?

image

Eh nope, I think we're searching for a icon for the docs.codeberg.org sidebar.

image

Gitlab/Github don't use icons in their documentation, so I was using the ones they have on the repository's sidebar.

> I see. So it needs to be one color and fit to the icons in those top tabs right? > > ![image](/attachments/02af968d-c9ae-406a-aee9-9e829bdfe98e) Eh nope, I think we're searching for a icon for the docs.codeberg.org sidebar. ![image](/attachments/1a67d51f-1d16-4c1b-89e1-010c40e93416) Gitlab/Github don't use icons in their documentation, so I was using the ones they have on the repository's sidebar.
First-time contributor
Copy link

In that case I propose to use a generic icon like the others (font awesome or fork awesome), maybe:

image image image

In that case I propose to use a generic icon like the others (font awesome or fork awesome), maybe: ![image](/attachments/a1b63bc3-6114-425f-861a-80da4dc1b91e) ![image](/attachments/65d6a32e-eca3-4e89-984c-af62ab104153) ![image](/attachments/8cca99ad-dfd2-4b60-9267-f960d09cc9dc)
Author
Contributor
Copy link
https://fontawesome.com/icons/rotate?s=solid ?
Contributor
Copy link
https://fontawesome.com/icons/arrows-spin?s=solid This one might be better.
Author
Contributor
Copy link
created https://github.com/11ty/eleventy/issues/2493 ...
6543 requested review from n 2022年07月13日 01:17:50 +02:00
Contributor
Copy link

@6543 there are a lot of dead links that Codeberg CI links to besides this one. For example, all of the question mark icons in a repo's CI settings. Wouldn't it be better to revert Codeberg CI to link to Woodpecker's docs instead?

@6543 there are a lot of dead links that Codeberg CI links to besides this one. For example, all of the question mark icons in a repo's CI settings. Wouldn't it be better to revert Codeberg CI to link to Woodpecker's docs instead?
fnetX referenced this pull request from a commit 2022年07月17日 23:48:11 +02:00
jtbx referenced this pull request from a commit 2022年07月30日 23:05:49 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
n
Labels
Clear labels
Codeberg Pages
Issues affecting Codeberg Pages
Documentation Usability
Issues related to using and reading docs.codeberg.org
Forgejo
Good First Issue! 👋
Kind: Bug
Kind: Documentation
Kind: Enhancement
Kind: Feature
Kind: Question
Kind: Security
Licensing
Part: Generator
This is related to the generation of the documentation, not to the content itself
Priority: High
The priority is high
Priority: Low
The priority is low
Priority: Medium
The priority is medium
Reviewed: Confirmed
Something has been confirmed
Reviewed: Duplicate
Something exists already
Reviewed: Invalid
Something was marked as invalid
Reviewed: Wontfix
Something won't be fixed
Status: Blocked
Status: Help wanted
Contributions are welcome!
Status: In progress
Work is in progress
Status: Needs feedback
Feedback is needed
Status: Ready for Review
Work is completed
Status: Review
Review is in progress / Reviewers wanted
Status: Stale
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Documentation!237
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Documentation
No description provided.
Delete branch "add_ci-site"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?