improve issue dependency search #619

gerhardbeck commented 2022年05月08日 19:52:50 +02:00

Ich beginne gerade das erste Mal mit Abhängigkeiten bei Issues zu arbeiten und die Suche treibt mich etwas zur Verzweiflung.

• es scheint nicht zu gehen, dass man nur mit # und Zahl sucht
• bei der Suche mit Titel will sie anscheinend den korrekten Anfang des Issues
• sinnvoll erschiene mir, wenn zuerst passende Issues aus der gleichen Repo bzw. Der gleichen Organisation erscheinen würden - das scheint nicht der Fall zu sein.

Ich beginne gerade das erste Mal mit Abhängigkeiten bei Issues zu arbeiten und die Suche treibt mich etwas zur Verzweiflung. - es scheint nicht zu gehen, dass man nur mit # und Zahl sucht - bei der Suche mit Titel will sie anscheinend den korrekten Anfang des Issues - sinnvoll erschiene mir, wenn zuerst passende Issues aus der gleichen Repo bzw. Der gleichen Organisation erscheinen würden - das scheint nicht der Fall zu sein.

fnetX commented 2022年05月09日 00:12:31 +02:00

Codeberg is an international and global community. Please write in English here. Auto-translated:

I am just starting to work with dependencies on issues for the first time and the search is driving me a bit to despair.

• it doesn't seem to work to search only with # and number
• when searching with title it seems to want the correct beginning of the issue
• it would make sense to me if matching issues from the same repo or the same organization would appear first - this does not seem to be the case.

---

I agree, the search is very suboptimal. We've been working on the performance recently, maybe this can be one of the next steps.

To the second point: No, it shouldn't need the start, but exact / full words, e.g. you can't find an issue with "blah v1.09.3" by searching for "1.09.3" or "v1.09", you must search "v1.09.3" exactly.

Codeberg is an international and global community. Please write in English here. Auto-translated: > I am just starting to work with dependencies on issues for the first time and the search is driving me a bit to despair. > - it doesn't seem to work to search only with # and number > - when searching with title it seems to want the correct beginning of the issue > - it would make sense to me if matching issues from the same repo or the same organization would appear first - this does not seem to be the case. --- I agree, the search is very suboptimal. We've been working on the performance recently, maybe this can be one of the next steps. To the second point: No, it shouldn't need the start, but exact / full words, e.g. you can't find an issue with "blah v1.09.3" by searching for "1.09.3" or "v1.09", you must search "v1.09.3" exactly.

gerhardbeck commented 2022年05月09日 15:26:57 +02:00

Sorry, just forgot to write in English instead of German.

ok, I wasn't aware of the need of full words. I'd suggest partial search, too

Sorry, just forgot to write in English instead of German. ok, I wasn't aware of the need of full words. I'd suggest partial search, too

harald commented 2024年12月11日 11:41:30 +01:00

This is really confusing and weird. I had to come to this issue to make progress :-)

If performance is not easy to fix and takes some time, could a stop gap measure be to put a little [?]->popup button with a short explanation like

Use complete words to search. Expect it to be slow. See issue #619

just after the "Dependencies" text?

This is really confusing and weird. I had to come to this issue to make progress :-) If performance is not easy to fix and takes some time, could a stop gap measure be to put a little [?]->popup button with a short explanation like > Use complete words to search. Expect it to be slow. See issue https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/619 just after the "Dependencies" text?

tusharhero commented 2025年05月14日 12:28:10 +02:00

This is still very confusing to use.

This is still very confusing to use.

tusharhero commented 2025年05月17日 09:05:55 +02:00

It is not just confusing, it just doesn't work. I think it would be
better to disable it at this point.

It is not just confusing, it just doesn't work. I think it would be better to disable it at this point.

Gusted commented 2025年07月01日 21:08:53 +02:00

forgejo/forgejo#8003 will improve the situation.

forgejo/forgejo#8003 will improve the situation.

tusharhero commented 2025年07月02日 06:13:52 +02:00

@Gusted wrote in #619 (comment):

forgejo/forgejo#8003 will improve the situation.

When will it be enabled on codeberg?

@Gusted wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/619#issuecomment-5678216: > forgejo/forgejo#8003 will improve the situation. When will it be enabled on codeberg?

Gusted commented 2025年07月02日 11:52:23 +02:00

When Forgejo v13 is deployed. We might backport it sooner.

When Forgejo v13 is deployed. We might backport it sooner.

smichel17 commented 2025年09月13日 23:15:27 +02:00

Is inability to add dependencies by exact reference or url also fixed by that PR? I'm fine without search but would be nice to add deps when I already have the url/reference handy.

Screencast example

(Gnome screen recording doesn't show my cursor, unfortunately.)

Is inability to add dependencies by exact reference or url also fixed by that PR? I'm fine without search but would be nice to add deps when I already have the url/reference handy. <details><summary>Screencast example</summary> (Gnome screen recording doesn't show my cursor, unfortunately.) <video src="/attachments/e335c8b6-377f-4854-9f5f-842a7874d8dc" title="Screencast From 2025年09月13日 17-10-38" controls></video> </details>

smichel17 commented 2025年09月14日 14:09:54 +02:00

Actually I think I can answer my own question using the next instance— it does not. I'll open a new issue.

Actually I think I can answer my own question using the next instance— it does not. I'll open a new issue.

fnetX commented 2025年09月14日 16:20:12 +02:00

I agree that entering a reference should allow adding a dependency without the need to perform an actual search. Did you create an issue in Forgejo yet?

I agree that entering a reference should allow adding a dependency without the need to perform an actual search. Did you create an issue in Forgejo yet?

smichel17 commented 2025年09月14日 16:28:20 +02:00

forgejo/forgejo#9296

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9296