Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

Hacktathon idea: External tool for Gitea Issue Tracking from E-Mails (Service Desk) #526

Closed
opened 2021年10月09日 16:18:01 +02:00 by fnetX · 4 comments
Owner
Copy link

In August, we discussed ways of structuring incoming emails for Codeberg's abuse reporting, but decided that it's more important to get #424 properly solved.

Still, I want to share an idea that might be interesting to some of you as a weekend-hackathon-project to start and share. So if you are bored: I think this would be awesome for many projects, esp. for not needing an account or otherwise access to a Gitea repo. It could also be used for reporting security issues via mail and tracking this in an internal repo.

TL;DR:

  • an external and stand-alone service that is provided with a Gitea integration (API token or OAuth) and IMAP credentials
  • fetches emails and turns them into issues in a specified repo
  • sents replies there back to the reporter, or only on request, e.g. by mentioning a bot

further considerations could be:

  • make it easy to integrate with Gitea or host alongside (not too unfamiliar stack)
  • make it configurable not only for self-hostiing but as a hosted service, e.g. allowing configurable connections via OAuth or per-repo config
  • allow receiving of encrypted emails

I'll just share the initial idea from a chat:

maybe we can turn this into a weekend-hackathon-project: A standalone service, easily deployed, that fetches a mailbox every few minutes and creates Gitea issues for incoming mails. Replies are then sent out via email again, or maybe configurable if the user is mentioned. (Like, allow internal discussion and @blahbot sends a mail back to the user)

(reactions: 👍 x2)

everything special can be added later, core would be creating emails and a way to send replies.

In August, we discussed ways of structuring incoming emails for Codeberg's abuse reporting, but decided that it's more important to get #424 properly solved. Still, I want to share an idea that might be interesting to some of you as a weekend-hackathon-project to start and share. So if you are bored: I think this would be awesome for many projects, esp. for not needing an account or otherwise access to a Gitea repo. It could also be used for reporting security issues via mail and tracking this in an internal repo. TL;DR: - an external and stand-alone service that is provided with a Gitea integration (API token or OAuth) and IMAP credentials - fetches emails and turns them into issues in a specified repo - sents replies there back to the reporter, or only on request, e.g. by mentioning a bot further considerations could be: - make it easy to integrate with Gitea or host alongside (not too unfamiliar stack) - make it configurable not only for self-hostiing but as a hosted service, e.g. allowing configurable connections via OAuth or per-repo config - allow receiving of encrypted emails I'll just share the initial idea from a chat: > maybe we can turn this into a weekend-hackathon-project: A standalone service, easily deployed, that fetches a mailbox every few minutes and creates Gitea issues for incoming mails. Replies are then sent out via email again, or maybe configurable if the user is mentioned. (Like, allow internal discussion and @blahbot sends a mail back to the user) (reactions: 👍 x2) > everything special can be added later, core would be creating emails and a way to send replies.

An alternative to the above implementation would be to investigate how the upcoming federation support (#14186) of Gitea (bootstrapped via @dachary and the FedeProxy community, and seeking NGI funding (#16518)) can be used for such features. Moderation is a social activity and extending its support on the Fediverse via W3C ActivityPub / W3C ActivityStreams an ongoing effort with which Gitea may align.

An alternative to the above implementation would be to investigate how the upcoming [federation support (#14186)](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/14186) of Gitea (bootstrapped via @dachary and the [FedeProxy](https://fedeproxy.eu) community, and seeking [NGI funding (#16518)](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16518)) can be used for such features. Moderation is a social activity and extending its support on the Fediverse via [W3C ActivityPub](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/) / [W3C ActivityStreams](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/) an ongoing effort with which Gitea may align.
Author
Owner
Copy link

You're talking about moderation? That issue #424. This issue is about creating issues from emails, for creating the behaviour that support / ticket systems do. You can also make use of the idea outlined above to provide user support via tickets etc.

You're talking about moderation? That issue #424. This issue is about creating issues from emails, for creating the behaviour that support / ticket systems do. You can also make use of the idea outlined above to provide user support via tickets etc.

Ah okay, sorry for that. I will copy it there just as a FYI to maybe inspire..

Ah okay, sorry for that. I will copy it there just as a FYI to maybe inspire..
Author
Owner
Copy link
WIP https://codeberg.org/crapStone/email-service 😉
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#526
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?