Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

Prevent users from registering with throwaway mail providers #464

Closed
opened 2021年06月03日 18:47:09 +02:00 by fnetX · 2 comments
Owner
Copy link

Block throwaway email providers upon creation and not on delivery stage.

Current setup:
We use a list of domains to prevent our mailservers from peering with well-known throwaway email providers. This list is synced from external resources.

Problems:
This approach leads to frequent issues, Although we added a static warning to the registration step, users often don't consider their email service providers as a throwaway email provider - and sometimes it isn't one either.
Also, users who sucessfully validated their email will stop receiving Codeberg news, if their domain was added later - even if they intended to continue using it (especially relevant for aliases)

ToDo:

  • prevent users from registering with throwaway email providers (instant user feedback)
  • re-allow sending emails to these domains to make sure users receive their email
    • (or: inform users their domain was removed and allow them to unlock their account with a new one - much more complicated!)
  • look for a new source of truth for throwaway email providers, because some of the listed domains (gmx.com, googlemail) are probably considered as legitimate use by us, maybe also reconsider deployment (not relying on cron and a text file?)
Might also be relevant: #174 #328 Codeberg/gitea!18
Block throwaway email providers upon creation and not on delivery stage. **Current setup:** We use a list of domains to prevent our mailservers from peering with well-known throwaway email providers. This list is synced from external resources. **Problems:** This approach leads to frequent issues, Although we added a static warning to the registration step, users often don't consider their email service providers as a throwaway email provider - and sometimes it isn't one either. Also, users who sucessfully validated their email will stop receiving Codeberg news, if their domain was added later - even if they intended to continue using it (especially relevant for aliases) **ToDo:** - [ ] prevent users from registering with throwaway email providers (instant user feedback) - [ ] re-allow sending emails to these domains to make sure users receive their email - [ ] (or: inform users their domain was removed and allow them to unlock their account with a new one - much more complicated!) - [ ] look for a new source of truth for throwaway email providers, because some of the listed domains (gmx.com, googlemail) are probably considered as legitimate use by us, maybe also reconsider deployment (not relying on cron and a text file?) ###### Might also be relevant: #174 #328 Codeberg/gitea!18
fnetX changed title from (削除) Block throwaway email providers upon creation (削除ここまで) to Prevent users from registering with throwaway mail providers 2021年06月03日 18:51:38 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Just noting here: If someone builds a simple bash script / function that

  • filters the recipients domain from a mail
  • compares this against a list of domains (text file)
  • instead sends a "We do not allow this mail provider"

this could also be a very first step if someone gets here but is not interested in working at Gitea code.

Just noting here: If someone builds a simple bash script / function that - filters the recipients domain from a mail - compares this against a list of domains (text file) - instead sends a "We do not allow this mail provider" this could also be a very first step if someone gets here but is not interested in working at Gitea code.
Author
Owner
Copy link

Implemented now.

Implemented now.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#464
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?