Codeberg/Community
55
329
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

Broken links referring from pkg.go.dev to codeberg.org #413

Closed
opened 2021年03月08日 17:52:25 +01:00 by ac · 5 comments

It looks like the links used on pkg.go.dev (Golang package documentation companion) that refer to packages on codeberg.org are broken.

They use links with abbreviated git commit hashes and gitea seems to 404 those instead of redirecting them to the long notation.

Example: https://pkg.go.dev/codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519

If you click on any link on this page that refers to a specific file on codeberg.org, then the links resolves to a 404.

Let's go into detail:

Go to https://pkg.go.dev/codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519#section-sourcefiles and take a look at the link for the file ecdh25519.go.

It refers to ac/ecdh25519@8a2cf2a5c9/ecdh25519.go

If you call that link, you'll receive a 404:

$ curl -I https://codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c/ecdh25519.go
HTTP/2 404
...

The correct permalink is however:

ac/ecdh25519@8a2cf2a5c9/ecdh25519.go

Workaround:

Either redirect the short form to the long form or provide an alternative src/commit/{short}/sourcefile as an alternative path.

I also opened an issue at the go community. https://github.com/golang/go/issues/44865

It looks like the links used on pkg.go.dev (Golang package documentation companion) that refer to packages on codeberg.org are broken. They use links with abbreviated git commit hashes and gitea seems to 404 those instead of redirecting them to the long notation. Example: https://pkg.go.dev/codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519 If you click on any link on this page that refers to a specific file on codeberg.org, then the links resolves to a 404. Let's go into detail: Go to https://pkg.go.dev/codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519#section-sourcefiles and take a look at the link for the file ecdh25519.go. It refers to https://codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c/ecdh25519.go If you call that link, you'll receive a 404: ``` $ curl -I https://codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c/ecdh25519.go HTTP/2 404 ... ``` The correct permalink is however: > https://codeberg.org/ac/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c3fb69f0e6161f4bb82dcc3584b0/ecdh25519.go Workaround: Either redirect the short form to the long form or provide an alternative src/commit/{short}/sourcefile as an alternative path. I also opened an issue at the go community. https://github.com/golang/go/issues/44865

@ac this is a gitea bug witch is fixed on master. witch mean gitea <= 1.13.4 only is afected :/

test for upcomming release:

  • https://try.gitea.io/abcKing/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c/ecdh25519.go
  • https://try.gitea.io/abcKing/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c3fb69f0e6161f4bb82dccc3584b0/ecdh25519.go
@ac this is a gitea bug witch is fixed on master. witch mean gitea <= 1.13.4 only is afected :/ test for upcomming release: * `https://try.gitea.io/abcKing/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c/ecdh25519.go` * `https://try.gitea.io/abcKing/ecdh25519/src/commit/8a2cf2a5c93c3fb69f0e6161f4bb82dccc3584b0/ecdh25519.go`
Owner
Copy link

Does it make sense to backport this for Codeberg?

Does it make sense to backport this for Codeberg?

@fnetX it would be a custom bugfix (no backport) ... I can have a look at it, but not right now.

@fnetX it would be a custom bugfix (no backport) ... I can have a look at it, but not right now.
Owner
Copy link

@ac how much of a breaker is it to you (and supposedly others) at the moment? I mean, clicking on the link still finds the correct repo, but not at the correct timestamp.

@6543 Gitea 1.14 is to be expected rather soon, right?

@ac how much of a breaker is it to you (and supposedly others) at the moment? I mean, clicking on the link still finds the correct repo, but not at the correct timestamp. @6543 Gitea 1.14 is to be expected rather soon, right?
Author
Copy link

@fnetX Codeberg/Go users may be irritated by it. But since the issue is known and it is just a matter of time for a fixed release, I don't think that there is any hurry for backports or alike.

Just a minor malfunction, as annoying as it is, just like all the bugs in the world. I only wanted it to be taken on and be solved sooner rather than later.

Thank you!

@fnetX Codeberg/Go users may be irritated by it. But since the issue is known and it is just a matter of time for a fixed release, I don't think that there is any hurry for backports or alike. Just a minor malfunction, as annoying as it is, just like all the bugs in the world. I only wanted it to be taken on and be solved sooner rather than later. Thank you!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#413
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?