While I was reading #362, marked as bug, I felt that the PR was a bit of a bolt-on to something that is a workaround to missing Gitea functionality.
Isn't the issue really that Codeberg - with Gitea lacking a Github-like Pages feature of its own (i.e. with repo Settings UI for Pages) - came up with the workaround to have a "Pages" magic name to demarkate Pages repositories?
A possible solution being to turn the Codeberg Pages functionality in, idk, a Gitea plugin project maybe, offered on awesome-gitea, so its available all across the (gitea-)board, and for more people to add contrib?
Then other open issues (e.g. #303 #218 #115) with pending/proposed features can be addressed in that project.
While I was reading #362, marked as bug, I felt that the PR was a bit of a bolt-on to something that is a workaround to missing Gitea functionality.
Isn't the issue really that Codeberg - with Gitea lacking a Github-like Pages feature of its own (i.e. with repo Settings UI for Pages) - came up with the workaround to have a "Pages" magic name to demarkate Pages repositories?
A possible solution being to turn the Codeberg Pages functionality in, idk, a Gitea plugin project maybe, offered on [awesome-gitea](https://gitea.com/gitea/awesome-gitea), so its available all across the (gitea-)board, and for more people to add contrib?
Then other open issues (e.g. #303 #218 #115) with pending/proposed features can be addressed in that project.