Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

Add MathJax support to the wikis #364

Closed
opened 2020年12月14日 00:59:11 +01:00 by jfch · 5 comments

Hi, a few years ago a gitea user asked for LaTeX support in the Gitea issues tracker on GitHub. A few users showed interest due to the good support for rendering mathematical expressions which LaTeX has. Someone suggested to add the MathJax libraries to the templates as an easy workaround to avoid to add external renderers to the backend.

I would like to use the Codeberg Wikis to document some simple electronic projects, showing some rendered formulas in the wiki. Unfortunately, the LaTeX issue was never solved and there is no way to render a formula using an unmodified Gitea Wiki. Could you add MathJax support to Codeberg?. You only need to add the library to the templates on your side. The users can use it just writing a line with a correct formula in the wiki and it would be rendered.

Hi, a few years ago a gitea user asked for LaTeX support in the Gitea issues tracker on GitHub. A few users showed interest due to the good support for rendering mathematical expressions which LaTeX has. [Someone suggested to add the MathJax libraries to the templates as an easy workaround to avoid to add external renderers to the backend.](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/3445#issuecomment-439673050) I would like to use the Codeberg Wikis to document some simple electronic projects, showing some rendered formulas in the wiki. Unfortunately, the LaTeX issue was never solved and there is no way to render a formula using an unmodified Gitea Wiki. Could you add MathJax support to Codeberg?. You only need to add the library to the templates on your side. The users can use it just writing a line with a correct formula in the wiki and it would be rendered.
Member
Copy link

We have implemented and tested this for codeberg-test (Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea@9532f25178), however the overhead of loading the somewhat large mathjax library to every page made us hesitant to deploy it unconditionally, as this would affect all slow devices over low-bandwidth connections.

However if the mathjax JS would be loaded lazy and only on demand if actual latex escapes are found on the page, as we do with three.js for STL view, this problem would get circumvented. PR welcome

We have implemented and tested this for codeberg-test (https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea/commit/9532f25178438cde904bc82fc8a9ec04f821c625), however the overhead of loading the somewhat large mathjax library to every page made us hesitant to deploy it unconditionally, as this would affect all slow devices over low-bandwidth connections. However if the mathjax JS would be loaded lazy and only on demand if actual latex escapes are found on the page, as we do with three.js for STL view, this problem would get circumvented. PR welcome
Author
Copy link

Thanks for the quick reply. I've been reading the tree.js PR and I can't write something equivalent for MathJax. Lets keep the feature request open so someone with the right skills can implement it.

Thanks for the quick reply. I've been reading the tree.js PR and I can't write something equivalent for MathJax. Lets keep the feature request open so someone with the right skills can implement it.

Is there a reason to not add the gitea label to this issue? It looks like something to contribute to gitea, doesn't it?

Is there a reason to not add the **gitea** label to this issue? It looks like something to contribute to gitea, doesn't it?

Is there a reason to not add the gitea label to this issue? It looks like something to contribute to gitea, doesn't it?

Maybe becuase it was forgotten? Anyhow, on a related news. I did saw a interesting Pull Request in my mail yesterday, which will add KaTeX support. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/20571

> Is there a reason to not add the **gitea** label to this issue? It looks like something to contribute to gitea, doesn't it? Maybe becuase it was forgotten? Anyhow, on a related news. I did saw a interesting Pull Request in my mail yesterday, which will add KaTeX support. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/20571
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#364
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?