Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

Static links to raw files vs Anubis? #2155

Open
opened 2025年10月02日 16:52:05 +02:00 by ltning · 1 comment

Comment

Hola! We (work) wanted to use Codeberg instead of GitHub to host the geofeed[1][2] for our IP networks, but there is some concern about whether Anubis will make fetching of the geofeed files challening. Is there a way to ensure that requests for specific files in their raw form are not subjected to the Anubis challenge, or anything else that might preclude automatic fetching?

A possible, and entirely acceptable, answer would be "we don't want you to do that." I completely understand if you don't want to carve out holes for this kind of traffic, or if you don't want Codeberg used for this purpose in the first place.

Thanks for reading!
/Eirik

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_geolocation#2000-Present
[2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8805.txt

### Comment Hola! We (work) wanted to use Codeberg instead of GitHub to host the geofeed[1][2] for our IP networks, but there is some concern about whether Anubis will make fetching of the geofeed files challening. Is there a way to ensure that requests for specific files in their raw form are not subjected to the Anubis challenge, or anything else that might preclude automatic fetching? A possible, and entirely acceptable, answer would be "we don't want you to do that." I completely understand if you don't want to carve out holes for this kind of traffic, or if you don't want Codeberg used for this purpose in the first place. Thanks for reading! /Eirik [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_geolocation#2000-Present [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8805.txt

@ltning wrote in #2155 (comment):

but there is some concern about whether Anubis will make fetching of the geofeed files challening

We only try to enforce Anubis on heavy endpoints, serving raw files is not one of them (unless someone tries to exhaust our network bandwidth). Also if you know a bit about Anubis, depending on how you are fetching it you can likely bypass the preconditions but I can't share that publicly of course ;)

Also you can always opt to use the API route (https://codeberg.org/api/swagger#/repository/repoGetRawFile) as API routes will not see browser challenges.

@ltning wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2155#issue-2471638: > but there is some concern about whether Anubis will make fetching of the geofeed files challening We only try to enforce Anubis on heavy endpoints, serving raw files is not one of them (unless someone tries to exhaust our network bandwidth). Also if you know a bit about Anubis, depending on how you are fetching it you can likely bypass the preconditions but I can't share that publicly of course ;) Also you can always opt to use the API route (https://codeberg.org/api/swagger#/repository/repoGetRawFile) as API routes will not see browser challenges.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#2155
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?