Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

500 when trying to access wiki page #2141

Open
opened 2025年09月21日 08:08:21 +02:00 by xarvh · 3 comments

Comment

My project's Wiki page provides three Page links:

https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/deleteme
https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Purity
https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Syntax-in-rows

Accessing any of them will display a 500 error page.

(I understand that the git url for the Wiki is git@codeberg.org:Squarepants/compiler.wiki.git , but cloning the url produces a completely different set of files).

### Comment [My project's Wiki page](https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/?action=_pages) provides three Page links: https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/deleteme https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Purity https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Syntax-in-rows Accessing any of them will display a 500 error page. (I understand that the git url for the Wiki is git@codeberg.org:Squarepants/compiler.wiki.git , but cloning the url produces a completely different set of files).

Hi, it seems there are multiple branches in the wiki branch and the branch you're getting shown is main, but retrieving the wiki pages is done from the master branch (for some unknown reason). I assume the pages that are in the master branch are correct? If so I can correct the wiki repository to use this branch.

Hi, it seems there are multiple branches in the wiki branch and the branch you're getting shown is `main`, but retrieving the wiki pages is done from the `master` branch (for some unknown reason). I assume the pages that are in the `master` branch are correct? If so I can correct the wiki repository to use this branch.
Author
Copy link

Moved everything to main and pushed.

The page at https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Syntax-in-rows still seems to produce a 500.
However https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Purity , which I modified in the push, seems to work.

I guess I can modify and push also Syntax-in-rows and it will probably fix the problem, but I'll wait just in case you want to have a look at how the problem originated in the first place.

Moved everything to `main` and pushed. The page at https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Syntax-in-rows still seems to produce a 500. However https://codeberg.org/Squarepants/compiler/wiki/Purity , which I modified in the push, seems to work. I guess I can modify and push also Syntax-in-rows and it will probably fix the problem, but I'll wait just in case you want to have a look at how the problem originated in the first place.

@xarvh wrote in #2141 (comment):

I guess I can modify and push also Syntax-in-rows and it will probably fix the problem, but I'll wait just in case you want to have a look at how the problem originated in the first place.

Not really much for me to do here, we did had a migration for the wiki repositories to migrate to main as default branch, maybe that might've done something but that was a long time ago. Feel free to fix it so the pages are accessible again.

@xarvh wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2141#issuecomment-7370584: > I guess I can modify and push also Syntax-in-rows and it will probably fix the problem, but I'll wait just in case you want to have a look at how the problem originated in the first place. Not really much for me to do here, we did had a migration for the wiki repositories to migrate to `main` as default branch, maybe that might've done something but that was a long time ago. Feel free to fix it so the pages are accessible again.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#2141
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?