pagination broken when using regexp search? #2098

mnalis commented 2025年08月21日 22:16:17 +02:00

Comment

• When I choose to search by regexp, e.g. \bchangeset\b it opens the first page of results correctly e.g. https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/search/branch/main?path=&q=%5Cbchangeset%5Cb&mode=regexp

• if there is more than one page of results, there is pagination navigation below, allowing to see page 2 / 3 / next / last of the results.

• however, that pagination doesn't work. When pressing e.g. on 2 to get second page of results; it leads to URL https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/search/branch/main?page=2&q=%5Cbchangeset%5Cb&l= and it says "no results" and in search type selection box that I was searching for "Union" and not Regexp

• I have to modify the URL manually by adding &mode=regexp at the end to make it work. It would be great if it worked by default!

### Comment - When I choose to search by regexp, e.g. `\bchangeset\b` it opens the **first page of results correctly** e.g. https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/search/branch/main?path=&q=%5Cbchangeset%5Cb&mode=regexp - if there is more than one page of results, there is pagination navigation below, allowing to see page `2` / `3` / `next` / `last` of the results. - however, **that pagination doesn't work**. When pressing e.g. on `2` to get second page of results; it leads to URL https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/search/branch/main?page=2&q=%5Cbchangeset%5Cb&l= and it says "no results" and in search type selection box that I was searching for "Union" and not `Regexp` - I have to modify the URL manually by adding `&mode=regexp` at the end to make it work. It would be great if it worked by default!

gedankenstuecke commented 2025年08月21日 22:21:53 +02:00

This is probably a general bug with Forgejo. I looked through the projects repo at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo and it seems not reported there. Would you be willing to open the issue there? 😊

This is probably a general bug with Forgejo. I looked through the projects repo at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo and it seems not reported there. Would you be willing to open the issue there? 😊

mnalis commented 2025年08月22日 13:59:05 +02:00

Would you be willing to open the issue there? 😊

Sure, reported there at forgejo/forgejo#8997

Although, testing version they mention lacks that option completely 🤷‍♂️, so I cannot reproduce it on that test instance...

> Would you be willing to open the issue there? 😊 Sure, reported there at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8997 Although, testing version they mention lacks that option completely 🤷‍♂️, so I cannot reproduce it on that test instance...

gedankenstuecke commented 2025年08月22日 14:01:43 +02:00

Thanks for reporting it there!

Thanks for reporting it there!

snematoda commented 2025年08月24日 19:51:41 +02:00

@mnalis unfortunately i do not have the required permissions to close an issue here... but since this fix has been fixed, merged, and backported... please close this issue :)

@mnalis unfortunately i do not have the required permissions to close an issue here... but since this fix has been fixed, merged, and backported... please close this issue :)

mnalis commented 2025年08月24日 22:41:33 +02:00

please close this issue :)

Sure, no probs. I was waiting for forgejo/forgejo#9006 to land in https://codeberg.org production so I can verify if the fix works correctly (it still hasn't landed there), but I guess I can close it now and reopen it later if it doesn't...

> please close this issue :) Sure, no probs. I was waiting for https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9006 to land in https://codeberg.org production so I can verify if the fix works correctly (it still hasn't landed there), but I guess I can close it now and reopen it later if it doesn't...

Gusted commented 2025年09月01日 06:42:13 +02:00

Hi, the fix should be deployed now.

Hi, the fix should be deployed now.

mnalis commented 2025年09月01日 20:34:30 +02:00

the fix should be deployed now.

Thanks, I can confirm it seems to be working correctly now on https://codeberg.org/

> the fix should be deployed now. Thanks, I can confirm it seems to be working correctly now on https://codeberg.org/