Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

instructions to verify GPG key do not work on Windows #1808

Open
opened 2025年03月05日 18:13:38 +01:00 by vwegert-adesso · 3 comments

Comment

When trying to verify my GPG key with the instructions provided on https://codeberg.org/user/settings/keys, I always got the error message "Der GPG-Key, die Signatur, und das Token stimmen nicht überein, oder das Token ist veraltet.". I was able to verify the signature locally:

> echo "2911...c4d9" > token
> echo "2911...c4d9" | gpg -a --default-key C5...2 --detach-sig > signature
> gpg --verify signature token
gpg: Signatur vom 03/05/25 18:04:01 Mitteleurop�ische Zeit
gpg: mittels EDDSA-Schlüssel D9..72
gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Volker Wegert <volker.wegert@adesso.de>" [ultimativ]

Examining the token file, I noticed that the file contained both the double quotes as well as a line break. Removing these and signing the token from the file allowed me to verify my GPG key. It might be possible to use echo.2911...c4d9 to ged rid of the quotes, but that leaves the newline (don't know whether this is an issue)

### Comment When trying to verify my GPG key with the instructions provided on https://codeberg.org/user/settings/keys, I always got the error message "Der GPG-Key, die Signatur, und das Token stimmen nicht überein, oder das Token ist veraltet.". I was able to verify the signature locally: ``` > echo "2911...c4d9" > token > echo "2911...c4d9" | gpg -a --default-key C5...2 --detach-sig > signature > gpg --verify signature token gpg: Signatur vom 03/05/25 18:04:01 Mitteleurop�ische Zeit gpg: mittels EDDSA-Schlüssel D9..72 gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Volker Wegert <volker.wegert@adesso.de>" [ultimativ] ``` Examining the token file, I noticed that the file contained both the double quotes as well as a line break. Removing these and signing the token from the file allowed me to verify my GPG key. It might be possible to use `echo.2911...c4d9` to ged rid of the quotes, but that leaves the newline (don't know whether this is an issue)

@vwegert-adesso wrote in #1808 (comment):

Examining the token file, I noticed that the file contained both the double quotes as well as a line break

The line break is fine, Codeberg compensates for that. Although the double quotes is a problem, what terminal are you using? This sound like very interesting Windows behavior.

@vwegert-adesso wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1808#issue-1038067: > Examining the token file, I noticed that the file contained both the double quotes as well as a line break The line break is fine, Codeberg compensates for that. Although the double quotes is a problem, what terminal are you using? This sound like very interesting Windows behavior.

In this case plain cmd.exe:

C:\>echo "foo"
"foo"
C:\>echo foo
foo

I'm not necessarily suggesting any changes in the implementation of the current feature, just maybe a textual change - "on Windows use ..." vs "on an actual operating system use..."

In this case plain cmd.exe: ``` C:\>echo "foo" "foo" C:\>echo foo foo ``` I'm not necessarily suggesting any changes in the implementation of the current feature, just maybe a textual change - "on Windows use ..." vs "on an actual operating system use..."

The Command Prompt (cmd.exe) is extremely ancient and does not support many of the things used in modern shells.

I've seen some documentations outright saying that the commands written should only be executed with the cross-platform PowerShell (pwsh / GH microsoft/PowerShell), not even the Windows PowerShell (not the same thing as pwsh, this one is older).

The Command Prompt (`cmd.exe`) is extremely ancient and does not support many of the things used in modern shells. I've seen some documentations outright saying that the commands written should only be executed with the _cross-platform PowerShell_ (`pwsh` / GH microsoft/PowerShell), not even the Windows PowerShell (not the same thing as `pwsh`, this one is older).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#1808
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?