Codeberg/Community
54
325
Fork
You've already forked Community
12

add orcid as a sign-in option #1304

Open
opened 2023年09月25日 12:28:58 +02:00 by jcolomb · 5 comments

Comment

It would be good for academics to be able to sign in with their orcid account

Maybe In relation to #1297,

Doc at https://info.orcid.org/documentation/features/public-api/orcid-as-a-sign-in-option-to-your-system/

### Comment It would be good for academics to be able to sign in with their orcid account Maybe In relation to #1297, Doc at https://info.orcid.org/documentation/features/public-api/orcid-as-a-sign-in-option-to-your-system/

GitHub seems to have added this as an option.

image

GitHub seems to have added this as an option. ![image](/attachments/b28a430f-7894-4f74-b7a9-68ff41899951)

GitHub seems to have added this as an option.

I can not agree here. To my knowledge and tests Microsoft GitHub don't over sign in via ORCID.

The image you posted seems to be a "feature" to connect your Microsoft GitHub account with your ORCID identity. Useless for users but great for Microsoft and their "partners" because your data becomes even more valuable.

> GitHub seems to have added this as an option. I can not agree here. To my knowledge and tests Microsoft GitHub don't over sign in via ORCID. The image you posted seems to be a "feature" to connect your Microsoft GitHub account with your ORCID identity. Useless for users but great for Microsoft and their "partners" because your data becomes even more valuable.

this was vague. When I said this, I meant the option shown in the picture - not the sign-in feature. However, I understand that this was only tangentially relevant to the original post.

I believe that adding a whole new feature just to mine more data out of users is not the primary reason - there is a general interest in citable source code.

*this* was vague. When I said *this*, I meant the option shown in the picture - not the sign-in feature. However, I understand that this was only tangentially relevant to the original post. I believe that adding a whole new feature just to mine more data out of users is not the primary reason - there is a general interest in citable source code.

there is a general interest in citable source code.

How does a connection of a MS GitHub account and an ORCID account make any source code repository better citeable?
Have a look at https://help.zenodo.org/ for example. Here you can get a DOI for a specific software and its version.

> there is a general interest in citable source code. How does a connection of a MS GitHub account and an ORCID account make any source code repository better citeable? Have a look at https://help.zenodo.org/ for example. Here you can get a DOI for a specific software and its version.

honestly i don't know but i guess that ORCID thinks that this is beneficial or whatever https://info.orcid.org/orcid-and-github-sign-memorandum-of-understanding/

Now, how much that feature is useful or not - a philosophical / practical argument about code citation and what better alternatives exist is neither my domain of expertise nor an argument that I am honestly interested in having.

honestly i don't know but i guess that ORCID thinks that this is beneficial or whatever https://info.orcid.org/orcid-and-github-sign-memorandum-of-understanding/ Now, how much that feature is useful or not - a philosophical / practical argument about code citation and what better alternatives exist is neither my domain of expertise nor an argument that I am honestly interested in having.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility

Reduces accessibility and is thus a "bug" for certain user groups on Codeberg.
bug

Something is not working the way it should. Does not concern outages.
bug
infrastructure

Errors evidently caused by infrastructure malfunctions or outages
Codeberg

This issue involves Codeberg's downstream modifications and settings and/or Codeberg's structures.
contributions welcome

Please join the discussion and consider contributing a PR!
docs

No bug, but an improvement to the docs or UI description will help
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement

New feature
infrastructure

Involves changes to the server setups, use `bug/infrastructure` for infrastructure-related user errors.
legal

An issue directly involving legal compliance
licence / ToS

involving questions about the ToS, especially licencing compliance
please chill
we are volunteers

Please consider editing your posts and remember that there is a human on the other side. We get that you are frustrated, but it's harder for us to help you this way.
public relations

Things related to Codeberg's external communication
question

More information is needed
question
user support

This issue contains a clearly stated problem. However, it is not clear whether we have to fix anything on Codeberg's end, but we're helping them fix it and/or find the cause.
s/Forgejo

Related to Forgejo. Please also check Forgejo's issue tracker.
s/Forgejo/migration

Migration related issues in Forgejo
s/Pages

Issues related to the Codeberg Pages feature
s/Weblate

Issue is related to the Weblate instance at https://translate.codeberg.org
s/Woodpecker

Woodpecker CI related issue
security

involves improvements to the sites security
service

Add a new service to the Codeberg ecosystem (instead of implementing into Gitea)
upstream

An open issue or pull request to an upstream repository to fix this issue (partially or completely) exists (i.e. Gitea, Forgejo, etc.)
wontfix

Codeberg's current set of contributors are not planning to spend time on delegating this issue.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Community#1304
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Community
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?