[CI] Self-hosted and open source Weather Monitoring Application #672

knightdave commented 2025年03月27日 23:12:48 +01:00

Projects

• Project

Expected Resource Usage

medium

I would also like the following users to be added

No response

Additional Information

It's my first side project after working hours, I wanted to try woodpecker-ci as I already had experience with GH actions, GitLab CI and Jenkins. I also wanted to setup local woodpecker-ci instance and have compatible configs between homelab and remote code repo.

Other Work

I'm not super active coder, so don't expect too much workload after service will be up and running :)

• https://github.com/knightdave
• https://gitlab.com/knightdave/

Statement

• I have placed a LICENSE file in my repository. (Or equivalent, such as COPYING or a LICENSES folder)
• I understand that Codeberg's CI might not always be available or stable, despite best efforts.
• I understand that I can use the feedback repository to share feedback or report problems.

### Projects - [Project](https://codeberg.org/silmataivas/silmataivas) ### Expected Resource Usage medium ### I would also like the following users to be added _No response_ ### Additional Information It's my first side project after working hours, I wanted to try woodpecker-ci as I already had experience with GH actions, GitLab CI and Jenkins. I also wanted to setup local woodpecker-ci instance and have compatible configs between homelab and remote code repo. ### Other Work I'm not super active coder, so don't expect too much workload after service will be up and running :) - https://github.com/knightdave - https://gitlab.com/knightdave/ ### Statement - [x] I have placed a LICENSE file in my repository. (Or equivalent, such as `COPYING` or a [LICENSES folder](https://reuse.software)) - [x] I understand that Codeberg's CI might not always be available or stable, despite best efforts. - [x] I understand that I can use the [feedback repository](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI/feedback) to share feedback or report problems.

detpikachu commented 2025年03月28日 09:58:18 +01:00

Hello, @knightdave! The linked project repository is private. Can you please elaborate on why this is, as well as clarifying the license this project is under?

Hello, @knightdave! The linked project repository is private. Can you please elaborate on why this is, as well as clarifying the license this project is under?

knightdave commented 2025年03月28日 12:58:23 +01:00

It's private because I was migrating it from gitlab, local disk and was doing history rebase and cleanup of all stuff that should not be there like my deployment script with server names, etc. I wanted to do that before I put project as public one. I cleaned that up and already made it public.

The license is gplv3 - if this somehow will become popular I'd like to get back contributions if somebody'd like to modify it.

It's in MVP state - it's working for me, I'm using that service for couple weeks already on my own VPC.

Now like I said - wanted to clean this up, add CI for building and publishing code, and start adding more features.

It's private because I was migrating it from gitlab, local disk and was doing history rebase and cleanup of all stuff that should not be there like my deployment script with server names, etc. I wanted to do that before I put project as public one. I cleaned that up and already made it public. The license is gplv3 - if this somehow will become popular I'd like to get back contributions if somebody'd like to modify it. It's in MVP state - it's working for me, I'm using that service for couple weeks already on my own VPC. Now like I said - wanted to clean this up, add CI for building and publishing code, and start adding more features.

detpikachu commented 2025年03月28日 13:00:16 +01:00

lgtm

Thanks for the clarifications!

lgtm Thanks for the clarifications!

codeberg-cibot commented 2025年03月28日 13:00:21 +01:00

Access granted.

@knightdave

Access granted. @knightdave