[CI] Increase Resources #644

malik commented 2025年03月17日 11:11:32 +01:00

Projects

• Datalad-Nix

Expected Resource Usage

medium

I would also like the following users to be added

No response

Additional Information

I was granted minimal resources in the past but run into timout issues.
I am not building the packages and modules for all platforms, only evaluating their nix definitions

Other Work

No response

Statement

• I have placed a LICENSE file in my repository. (Or equivalent, such as COPYING or a LICENSES folder)
• I understand that Codeberg's CI might not always be available or stable, despite best efforts.
• I understand that I can use the feedback repository to share feedback or report problems.

### Projects - [Datalad-Nix](https://codeberg.org/malik/datalad-nix) ### Expected Resource Usage medium ### I would also like the following users to be added _No response_ ### Additional Information I was granted minimal resources in the past but run into [timout issues](https://ci.codeberg.org/repos/14322/pipeline/62/55). I am not building the packages and modules for all platforms, only evaluating their nix definitions ### Other Work _No response_ ### Statement - [x] I have placed a LICENSE file in my repository. (Or equivalent, such as `COPYING` or a [LICENSES folder](https://reuse.software)) - [x] I understand that Codeberg's CI might not always be available or stable, despite best efforts. - [x] I understand that I can use the [feedback repository](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI/feedback) to share feedback or report problems.

detpikachu commented 2025年03月17日 12:30:01 +01:00

I belive timeout settings are set on an instance-level, rather than based on this questionnaire. I think @pat-s could offer more insight into this, or point us to someone who can?

I belive timeout settings are set on an instance-level, rather than based on this questionnaire. I think @pat-s could offer more insight into this, or point us to someone who can?

pat-s commented 2025年03月17日 13:05:06 +01:00

Resources and timeouts are two different things.
I cannot see a timeout issue in the linked build.
Besides, we can't control timeouts on the user level.

Your resource need it not medium or large but on the excessive scale. You run > 20 jobs on each ljll/PR which run 40-1h each (!).
Also in the process itself the bandwidth use is very high due to many downloads.

Please drastically reduce/rethink your CI workflows, resource use at this level falls into the "wasted resources" category.

If you don't agree and absolutely want to continue these builds, please provide your own runner (undocumented still right now).

Resources and timeouts are two different things. I cannot see a timeout issue in the linked build. Besides, we can't control timeouts on the user level. Your resource need it not medium or large but on the excessive scale. You run > 20 jobs on each ljll/PR which run 40-1h each (!). Also in the process itself the bandwidth use is very high due to many downloads. Please drastically reduce/rethink your CI workflows, resource use at this level falls into the "wasted resources" category. If you don't agree and absolutely want to continue these builds, please provide your own runner (undocumented still right now).

n0toose commented 2025年03月19日 12:09:04 +01:00

I'm considering this request as denied with the explicit ask to reduce the currently used resources ASAP. Closing.

I'm considering this request as **denied** with the explicit ask to reduce the currently used resources ASAP. Closing.