Codeberg-e.V./requests
55
63
Fork
You've already forked requests
10

Organization takeover request: Flathub #1628

Open
opened 2026年03月16日 10:47:37 +01:00 by barthalion · 4 comments

Hey folks, I'm an infrastructure engineer working for GNOME Foundation on Flathub. I am figuring out a potential migration plan to either Codeberg or self-hosted Forgejo, but in the meantime, I'm interested in testing if we can replicate all workflows; unfortunately, someone has taken over https://codeberg.org/flathub. Can I be given ownership of it?

Hey folks, I'm an infrastructure engineer working for GNOME Foundation on Flathub. I am figuring out a potential migration plan to either Codeberg or self-hosted Forgejo, but in the meantime, I'm interested in testing if we can replicate all workflows; unfortunately, someone has taken over https://codeberg.org/flathub. Can I be given ownership of it?

I support this request.

(Would be great if Flathub indeed makes the move at some point in the future! An own Forgejo instance probably makes sense. You may contact me or https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/moving-to-forgejo for support)

I support this request. (Would be great if Flathub indeed makes the move at some point in the future! An own Forgejo instance probably makes sense. You may contact me or https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/moving-to-forgejo for support)
Owner
Copy link

The original owner has been contacted. If there is no response, we'll have to decide, but there is some content that might be still important to that user.

The original owner has been contacted. If there is no response, we'll have to decide, but there is some content that might be still important to that user.

@fnetX wrote in #1628 (comment):

The original owner has been contacted. If there is no response, we'll have to decide, but there is some content that might be still important to that user.

If the repositories under that organisation are legitimate Flatpak repositories intended for inclusion in Flathub, then the original owner could legitimately keep these repositories under the Flathub org to maintain these Flatpaks.

@fnetX wrote in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-e.V./requests/issues/1628#issuecomment-13135407: > The original owner has been contacted. If there is no response, we'll have to decide, but there is some content that might be still important to that user. If the repositories under that organisation are legitimate Flatpak repositories intended for inclusion in Flathub, then the original owner could legitimately keep these repositories under the Flathub org to maintain these Flatpaks.

All three are already on Flathub, one being EOL-ed. https://github.com/flathub?q=%20org.KekikAkadem&type=all&language&sort

All three are already on Flathub, one being EOL-ed. https://github.com/flathub?q=%20org.KekikAkadem&type=all&language&sort
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg-e.V./requests#1628
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg-e.V./requests
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?