How difficult would it be to add support for p6-GtkPlus? #1

Xliff commented 2021年11月01日 22:12:54 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

If you need a link to the project, you can find it here. I wouldn't mind doing a lion share of the work if you could communicate the high level strategy of your design.

Thanks!

If you need a link to the project, you can find it [here](http://github.com/Xliff/p6-GtkPlus). I wouldn't mind doing a lion share of the work if you could communicate the high level strategy of your design. Thanks!

CIAvash commented 2021年11月02日 09:17:55 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I wasn't aware of your module, it hasn't been released yet?

I didn't add support for other libraries, all you need is a Pointer to window widget, or monitor if you want to use a method that works with monitor.

For example, for Gnome::Gtk3, it's $gtk_window.get-native-object for GTK::Simple, it's $app.WIDGET. And from having a quick look at your module, it's $gtk_window.widget along with some other aliases? So if I'm not mistaken, in short it would be:

use GTK::Window;
my GTK::Window $gtk_window .= new: GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL;
my $window = $gtk_window.widget;
my GtkLayerShell $layer_surface .= new: :$window, :init;

I wasn't aware of your module, it hasn't been released yet? I didn't add support for other libraries, all you need is a `Pointer` to window widget, or monitor if you want to use a method that works with monitor. For example, for Gnome::Gtk3, it's `$gtk_window.get-native-object` for GTK::Simple, it's `$app.WIDGET`. And from having a quick look at your module, it's `$gtk_window.widget` along with some other aliases? So if I'm not mistaken, in short it would be: ```raku use GTK::Window; my GTK::Window $gtk_window .= new: GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL; my $window = $gtk_window.widget; my GtkLayerShell $layer_surface .= new: :$window, :init; ```

Xliff commented 2021年11月02日 10:08:18 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@CIAvash, No. These have not been released yet. Mainly because it became quite large, quite quickly.

I'm glad to see your module is fairly agnostic in its approach. Thanks for writing it.

@CIAvash, No. These have not been released yet. Mainly because it became quite large, quite quickly. I'm glad to see your module is fairly agnostic in its approach. Thanks for writing it.