This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | jhylton |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, jhylton |
| Date | 2010年02月23日.22:51:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00016272381 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <e8bf7a531002231451x1b7c908fx95c57be98cd97fcc@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1266961045.83.0.043654954684.issue4199@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Is deferred blocker a higher priority? Jeremy On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> added the comment: > > "High" is not high enough :) > > ---------- > priority: high -> deferred blocker > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue4199> > _______________________________________ > |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010年02月23日 22:51:39 | jhylton | set | recipients: + jhylton, akuchling, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson |
| 2010年02月23日 22:51:37 | jhylton | link | issue4199 messages |
| 2010年02月23日 22:51:37 | jhylton | create | |