Message99560
| Author |
orsenthil |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, mbloore, orsenthil, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2010年02月19日.07:47:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.667952e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1266565652.2.0.872228816519.issue7904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Fixed in the r78234 and merged back to other branches.
I fell back to RFC's definition of scheme, as anything before the ://.
I did not see the need to add s3 specifically as a valid scheme type, because s3 itself is not registered a schemetype.
So, the fix should work for s3 and other undefined schemes as per RFC.
Thanks for the patch. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年02月19日 07:47:32 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, ezio.melotti, mbloore, r.david.murray |
| 2010年02月19日 07:47:32 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1266565652.2.0.872228816519.issue7904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年02月19日 07:47:30 | orsenthil | link | issue7904 messages |
| 2010年02月19日 07:47:29 | orsenthil | create |
|