Message99385
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
andrewclegg, eric.araujo |
| Date |
2010年02月16日.05:02:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
3.5640915e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1266296532.89.0.195780253421.issue7846@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hello
The feature seems useful to me and the patch straightforward.
I wonder why you used a global name for the max length ("_MAXCACHE") instead of inlining the value where it is used. Does it feel more constanty? ;) I fear that the leading underscore won’t discourage users from touching it, so I’d suggest making it public or completely hidden. On second thought, you could argue that Python is a matter of consenting adults, and that leading underscore is okay.
Regards |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年02月16日 05:02:13 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, andrewclegg |
| 2010年02月16日 05:02:12 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1266296532.89.0.195780253421.issue7846@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年02月16日 05:02:10 | eric.araujo | link | issue7846 messages |
| 2010年02月16日 05:02:10 | eric.araujo | create |
|