Message99195
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
aleax, lehmannro, loewis, r.david.murray, zhigang |
| Date |
2010年02月11日.03:32:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.9467281e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1265859164.42.0.56618196441.issue5483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree that caching for speed is something that should be implemented in another layer. It certainly is orthogonal to the writeback issue. The best caching strategy is going to depend on the application, so I don't think caching for speed belongs in Shelve itself. Closing as rejected. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年02月11日 03:32:44 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, loewis, aleax, lehmannro, zhigang |
| 2010年02月11日 03:32:44 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1265859164.42.0.56618196441.issue5483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年02月11日 03:32:38 | r.david.murray | link | issue5483 messages |
| 2010年02月11日 03:32:38 | r.david.murray | create |
|