Message98852
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
abbot, astrand, giampaolo.rodola, guettli, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, rnk, srid |
| Date |
2010年02月04日.20:11:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.853029e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1265314359.27288.1.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1265082449.69.0.261022562821.issue5673@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I agree. Does subprocess.TimeoutExpired sound good?
Yes.
> It won't be possible with the current implementation to put the partial output
> in the exception, because read blocks.
Fair enough :)
> I think call and check_call should clean up after themselves by
> killing the child processes they create, while communicate and wait should leave
> that to the user.
It sounds good. |
|