Message98521
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, benjamin.peterson, flox, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mhammond, ocean-city, r.david.murray, trent |
| Date |
2010年01月29日.18:35:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.2560123e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1264790142.49.0.0743028761973.issue3892@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hmm. That's not actually the same timeout. What that means is that if the startup timeout triggers, then a subsequent test (one that is looking for the results of a client transaction) fails, which contradicts the earlier observation that even if the startup timeout fails then everything else still passes. |
|