Message98029
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, brian.curtin, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, jafo, jaraco, lemburg, loewis, nnorwitz, r.david.murray, ssbarnea, swarren |
| Date |
2010年01月18日.20:28:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.6377127e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4B54C46C.6050701@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1263822997.54.0.935658682658.issue1578269@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Given that there is a specific permission that can be assigned to the
> buildslave user, it seems appropriate that the tests that attempt to
> create symlinks should fail if the user does not have that
> permission.
No, the test should *not* fail. A failing test means "the test has
completed, and the outcome was not expected, due to a bug somewhere
(the operating system, Python, or the test case proper)". This is not
the case if the link cannot be created - the resulting behavior is
exactly the correct, and expected one (under the circumstances).
> Martin, do you still prefer something that wraps tests that call
> symlink and only executes those tests if the current user context has
> that permission?
Most definitely. That's what the notion of a "skipped" test is for
(as opposed to a "failed" one). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年01月18日 20:28:33 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, lemburg, nnorwitz, jafo, amaury.forgeotdarc, jaraco, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, swarren, r.david.murray, ssbarnea, brian.curtin, asvetlov |
| 2010年01月18日 20:28:31 | loewis | link | issue1578269 messages |
| 2010年01月18日 20:28:30 | loewis | create |
|