Message97552
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, mark.dickinson, skrah, tim.peters |
| Date |
2010年01月10日.21:53:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.567605e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1263160424.35.0.150803455187.issue7632@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Showing once again that a proof of FP code correctness is about as
> compelling as a proof of God's ontological status ;-)
Clearly we need a 1000-page Isabelle/HOL-style machine-checked formal proof, rather than a ten-page TeX proof. Any takers?
All of the above bugs seem to have been introduced with the new 'bigcomp' code that arrived on March 16, 2009, just a couple of weeks before I downloaded the version that got adapted for Python; in retrospect, I probably should have used the NO_STRTOD_BIGCOMP #define to bypass the new code. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010年01月10日 21:53:44 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, tim.peters, eric.smith, skrah |
| 2010年01月10日 21:53:44 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1263160424.35.0.150803455187.issue7632@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010年01月10日 21:53:42 | mark.dickinson | link | issue7632 messages |
| 2010年01月10日 21:53:42 | mark.dickinson | create |
|