Message 95494 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	pitrou
Recipients	doko, pitrou
Date	2009年11月19日.17:06:45
SpamBayes Score	0.0006120174
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1258650406.78.0.31913498865.issue7360@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Oops, sorry: > I don't think this class aims at being safe against concurrent access, > so having it fail loudly is a good thing. I now understand that the problem is that it doesn't fail loudly. That's what I get for replying too quickly. Still, I don't think the suggested fix is ok. Perhaps we should simply state in the documentation that flush() discards the old file, so that other processes accessing it may get a surprise.

Content

Oops, sorry:
> I don't think this class aims at being safe against concurrent access,
> so having it fail loudly is a good thing.
I now understand that the problem is that it doesn't fail loudly. That's
what I get for replying too quickly.
Still, I don't think the suggested fix is ok. Perhaps we should simply
state in the documentation that flush() discards the old file, so that
other processes accessing it may get a surprise.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009年11月19日 17:06:46	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, doko
2009年11月19日 17:06:46	pitrou	set	messageid: <1258650406.78.0.31913498865.issue7360@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009年11月19日 17:06:45	pitrou	link	issue7360 messages
2009年11月19日 17:06:45	pitrou	create

homepage