Message 94958 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	benjamin.peterson
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, flashk
Date	2009年11月06日.01:48:38
SpamBayes Score	1.4011842e-10
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1afaf6160911051748y2e48a620lbfe91fce2307408e@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1257471498.88.0.704911920359.issue7268@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
2009年11月5日 flashk <report@bugs.python.org>: > > flashk <flashk@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Ok, but why am I still getting a syntax error in both 2.6 and 3.1 on the > file, even after converting the newlines? > > If I remove the trailing indentation then everything works properly on 2.6 > and 3.1, even with DOS newlines. > > It just seems that exec does not properly handle code that ends with an > empty indented line, but execfile handles it correctly. Well, it works for me with the empty newline. Can you isolate the exact problem?

Content

2009年11月5日 flashk <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> flashk <flashk@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Ok, but why am I still getting a syntax error in both 2.6 and 3.1 on the
> file, even after converting the newlines?
>
> If I remove the trailing indentation then everything works properly on 2.6
> and 3.1, even with DOS newlines.
>
> It just seems that exec does not properly handle code that ends with an
> empty indented line, but execfile handles it correctly.
Well, it works for me with the empty newline. Can you isolate the exact problem?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009年11月06日 01:48:39	benjamin.peterson	set	recipients: + benjamin.peterson, flashk
2009年11月06日 01:48:38	benjamin.peterson	link	issue7268 messages
2009年11月06日 01:48:38	benjamin.peterson	create

homepage