Message93598
| Author |
chuck |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, chuck |
| Date |
2009年10月05日.12:52:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.527401e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1254747137.66.0.201255873291.issue7063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The mp_ass_subscript function looks fine in contrast to array_ass_slice().
So if array_ass_slice() is not accessible from the outside and is only
called with NULL as replacement parameter from the inside, I won't be able
to cause trouble with those two issues.
Still I think it's bad to keep buggy code around, even it is not used.
Maybe array_ass_slice() should be changed to what it's used for:
array_del_slice()? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年10月05日 12:52:18 | chuck | set | recipients:
+ chuck, amaury.forgeotdarc |
| 2009年10月05日 12:52:17 | chuck | set | messageid: <1254747137.66.0.201255873291.issue7063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年10月05日 12:52:16 | chuck | link | issue7063 messages |
| 2009年10月05日 12:52:16 | chuck | create |
|