Message93081
| Author |
stefw |
| Recipients |
lemburg, stefw, tarek |
| Date |
2009年09月24日.17:29:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00065385154 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1253813360.83.0.839189485471.issue6983@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Other OSs have special cases in get_platform() to specifically limit the
amount of code, and make proper decisions with regard to package
compatibility.
Here's an example this commit for Mac OS X: http://svn.python.org/view?
view=rev&revision=67988
It was discussed here at this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue4064
Another example is how linux has no version information at all (ie:
linux-i586). Perhaps this is why the easy_install authors thought their
package system worked. They only tested it on linux?
Yes I agree that obviously this cannot be changed for 2.6. But it would
be great to get this code in for python 2.7
Anyway, this is ultimately your call, since I don't have the 50,000 foot
view over the entire situation.
FWIW, I've had to patch python in a very large set of client
installations. This patch has become a routine in order to unbreak
python wrt to platform dependent packages. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年09月24日 17:29:20 | stefw | set | recipients:
+ stefw, lemburg, tarek |
| 2009年09月24日 17:29:20 | stefw | set | messageid: <1253813360.83.0.839189485471.issue6983@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年09月24日 17:29:14 | stefw | link | issue6983 messages |
| 2009年09月24日 17:29:13 | stefw | create |
|