Message93010
| Author |
doughellmann |
| Recipients |
doughellmann, eric.smith, exarkun, georg.brandl, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, theller, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2009年09月22日.19:30:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.9806614e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1253647832.9.0.972923158129.issue6958@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
@theller, I'm not sure what your point is. I'm asking what the defined
behavior is if we provide some sort of global way to run a program with
logging configured, and then that app turns around and tries to
reconfigure it. Should the last one to call the configuration
function(s) win, or the first?
I like the idea of adding this feature to the logging module better than
building it into the interpreter, but I still think it opens up areas
for unexpected behavior, and it would be better to just let each
application set up its own logging. |
|