Message92176
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, jafo, jaraco, lemburg, loewis, nnorwitz, r.david.murray, swarren |
| Date |
2009年09月02日.18:50:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.5071056e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4A9EBE7D.2000008@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1251906508.72.0.365811214903.issue1578269@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I plan to look at this, and if it looks okay, commit it. Let me know if
> anyone has any remaining issues.
I have the general issue that the semantics of the Windows symlink
implementation are ill-defined. Specifically for the patch, I think
precise documentation of the implemented behavior is is missing (unless
it behaves like Unix symlink to the tiniest detail, which I doubt).
Without an exact specification of what it should do it is difficult
to tell whether it does that correctly. |
|