Message91289
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, gvanrossum, rhettinger |
| Date |
2009年08月05日.00:35:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
9.797681e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1249432514.19.0.487868777584.issue2335@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see a
problem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as long
as they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spend
effort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someone
volunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting set
literals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr()
needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6. |
|