Message91055
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
Red HamsterX, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, gvanrossum, pitrou, r.david.murray, sanxiyn |
| Date |
2009年07月29日.17:55:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.9641072e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1248890147.35.0.692190734224.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It strikes me as simply a documentation bug. Maybe whoever wrote the
docs just assumed it would work that way. I expect that changing it to
insist on valid input would break some use cases. If you want a
validating API, perhaps a new API could be added that validates as well
as converts. |
|