Message90066
| Author |
elprans |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, elprans, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, marcelo_fernandez |
| Date |
2009年07月03日.16:18:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0025004724 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1246637905.24.0.725937753968.issue5672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Please don't provide a wrapper around ptrctrl
prctl is not portable. I always thought that the premise of stdlib is to
provide portable interfaces. BSD, for example, uses setprocname instead
of prctl. Also, prctl does not modify the process name shown in "ps
uxww". Here's how PostgreSQL does this: http://tinyurl.com/mhjuqc. |
|