Message88824
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jafo, jimjjewett, lemburg, orivej, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date |
2009年06月03日.20:41:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.2551605e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1244061829.5505.23.camel@localhost> |
| In-reply-to |
<1244048805.07.0.393821899189.issue1943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Still, I expect that a vanishingly small number of users will actually
> use that feature.
Apart from the example Marc-André just posted (and which is a 0.0.1
proof of concept he apparently just wrote), the number of users is,
AFAICT, zero.
Unless there's some closed source extension which happens to extend
unicode as a C subtype.
Now, as for easing the subclassing of unicode in C, there are probably
several possibilities which range from devising a clever set of macros
to abusing the ob_size field for a tagged pointer. People who really
care should do a concrete proposal (and I don't know who these people
are, apart from Marc-André). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年06月03日 20:41:36 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, lemburg, gvanrossum, collinwinter, rhettinger, jafo, jimjjewett, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.smith, ajaksu2, orivej, ezio.melotti |
| 2009年06月03日 20:41:35 | pitrou | link | issue1943 messages |
| 2009年06月03日 20:41:34 | pitrou | create |
|