Message88814
| Author |
conf |
| Recipients |
conf, exarkun, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2009年06月03日.15:27:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0013940318 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1244042831.14.0.660542343208.issue5230@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I had lots of stuff to do lately, sorry it took me so long to answer.
Here is the patch as we intended, but there is a bug yet.
What if the non-existent imported module has the same name of the module
itself?
$ cat pydoc_badimport3.py
import this_doesnt_exist.pydoc_badimport3
$ pydoc pydoc_badimport3
I tested this possibility, and I found out that there is a bug in this
situation yet: pydoc still tells the user that the module couldn't be found. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年06月03日 15:27:11 | conf | set | recipients:
+ conf, exarkun, r.david.murray |
| 2009年06月03日 15:27:11 | conf | set | messageid: <1244042831.14.0.660542343208.issue5230@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年06月03日 15:27:09 | conf | link | issue5230 messages |
| 2009年06月03日 15:27:09 | conf | create |
|