Message88719
| Author |
claymation |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields |
| Date |
2009年06月02日.06:34:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.466921e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<8657ee3f0906012334h2653205fo73c5182be43db795@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<4A24C407.4010305@v.loewis.de> |
| Content |
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>> I'd like to see the issues fixed upstream, and the library removed
>> from Python until it is satisfactory to the developers who will
>> actually use it. To my knowledge, every developer (outside of Google)
>> who has commented on the issue has indicated a preference for a
>> different API.
>
> That's not true - I'm outside of Google, and have not indicated such
> a preference.
You've indicated no preference either way, and have said:
"I personally have no plans for using this library, or any other IP
address library"
I should think you would seek the opinion of those developers who
actually do have plans to use an IP address library. As far as I can
tell, every developer in that category, outside of Google, that has
commented on this issue here or in python-dev has advocated a
different API.
Clay |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年06月02日 06:35:44 | claymation | set | recipients:
+ claymation, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann |
| 2009年06月02日 06:35:30 | claymation | link | issue3959 messages |
| 2009年06月02日 06:35:17 | claymation | create |
|