Message86913
| Author |
benjamin.peterson |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, pitrou |
| Date |
2009年05月01日.21:30:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.5824728e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1241213449.29.0.821681406925.issue3672@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/5
File Doc/library/codecs.rst (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/5#newcode326
Line 326: In addition, the following error handlers are specific to only
selected
"In addition, the following error handlers are specific to a single
codec." sounds better
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/5#newcode335
Line 335:
There should probably be a versionchanged directive indicating that
"surrogates" was added in 3.1.
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/6
File Lib/test/test_codecs.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/6#newcode544
Line 544: def test_surrogates(self):
I think this should be split into 2 tests. "test_lone_surrogates" and
"test_surrogate_handler".
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/4
File Objects/unicodeobject.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/4#newcode157
Line 157: static PyObject *unicode_encode_call_errorhandler(const char
*errors,
These prototypes are longer than 80 chars some places. I don't think the
arguments need to line up with the starting parenthesis.
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/4#newcode2393
Line 2393: s, size, &exc, i-1, i, &newpos);
"exc" is never Py_DECREFed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/4#newcode4110
Line 4110: if (!PyUnicode_Check(repunicode)) {
Is there a test of this case somewhere?
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/2
File Python/codecs.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/2#newcode758
Line 758: if (PyObject_IsInstance(exc, PyExc_UnicodeEncodeError)) {
I believe PyErr_GivenExceptionMatches is more appropriate here, but
given the rest of the file uses PyObject_IsInstance, it likely doesn't
matter.
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081/diff/1/2#newcode771
Line 771: return NULL;
This is leaks "object".
http://codereview.appspot.com/52081 |
|