Message86335
| Author |
movement |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, bretthoerner, chrismiles, danchr, jcea, laca, movement, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, sirg3, skip.montanaro, twleung |
| Date |
2009年04月22日.21:17:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.387066e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1240435056.83.0.655098164584.issue4111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, my mistake. I noticed this typo in the original patch:
207 +PyObject *
208 +PyEval_EvalFrameexEx(PyFrameObject *f, int throwflag))
Can you:
- verify that HAVE_DTRACE is indeed defined for ceval.c
- do an nm on ceval.o and look which Eval* functions you do have
Somehow, PyEval_EvalFrameEx seems not to be ending up in the .o file. It
should be easy for you to work out why... |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年04月22日 21:17:36 | movement | set | recipients:
+ movement, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, bretthoerner, laca, twleung, robert.kern, sirg3, chrismiles, danchr |
| 2009年04月22日 21:17:36 | movement | set | messageid: <1240435056.83.0.655098164584.issue4111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年04月22日 21:17:35 | movement | link | issue4111 messages |
| 2009年04月22日 21:17:35 | movement | create |
|