Message86173
| Author |
eric.smith |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, mark.dickinson |
| Date |
2009年04月19日.15:26:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00036151402 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1240154799.14.0.997674478084.issue5793@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I concur. I've also been bitten by forgetting Py_CHARMASK, so a single
version that took this into account (and was locale-unaware) would be
welcome.
In private mail I'd mentioned that if these are functions, they should
take int. But I now think that's incorrect, and they should take char or
unsigned char. I think the standard C functions take int because they
also allow EOF. I think the Py_ versions should allow only characters
and not allow EOF. Py_CHARMASK already enforces this, anyway, with
likely undefined results. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年04月19日 15:26:39 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, mark.dickinson |
| 2009年04月19日 15:26:39 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1240154799.14.0.997674478084.issue5793@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年04月19日 15:26:38 | eric.smith | link | issue5793 messages |
| 2009年04月19日 15:26:37 | eric.smith | create |
|