Message85772
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, bob.ippolito, pitrou |
| Date |
2009年04月08日.16:01:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.3111172e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1239206585.8071.5.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1239205905.04.0.140762298078.issue5723@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Is this high priority? The pure-Python code paths don't even run in
> cpython. I test them manually with simplejson by just deleting the
> extension and then running the tests again. There doesn't seem to be a
> very good way to do this sort of thing
The main reason I've put it as "high priority" is that right now I'm
porting the new json to py3k, and I can't know whether the pure Python
paths are ported correctly. That probably won't refrain us from
committing it, especially if you say that they are never run with
CPython. |
|