Message85605
| Author |
ajaksu2 |
| Recipients |
ajaksu2, barry, rndblnch |
| Date |
2009年04月06日.01:40:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0004780425 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1238982024.13.0.295536333016.issue1672568@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hmm, ISTM that a change that breaks existing code that relies on
documented behavior has a negligible chance of being accepted.
However, I agree that the current behavior isn't developer-friendly. I
think adding an alternative behavior to get_payload (add a new
parameter?), allowing callers to log errors and/or displaying warnings
could have a better chance of being accepted, while still providing the
control you want.
Barry? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年04月06日 01:40:24 | ajaksu2 | set | recipients:
+ ajaksu2, barry, rndblnch |
| 2009年04月06日 01:40:24 | ajaksu2 | set | messageid: <1238982024.13.0.295536333016.issue1672568@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年04月06日 01:40:22 | ajaksu2 | link | issue1672568 messages |
| 2009年04月06日 01:40:21 | ajaksu2 | create |
|