Message85249
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger, skip.montanaro |
| Date |
2009年04月02日.19:22:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
5.301127e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1238700249.8858.33.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<18901.3985.823112.130299@montanaro.dyndns.org> |
| Content |
> You don't, but use of assert statements seems a hell of a lot more Pythonic
> to me than all the assert* or fail* method names which I can never remember.
Two problems:
1. they are optimized away in "-Oxxx" mode
2. they don't provide good reporting in case of failure |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年04月02日 19:22:45 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, purcell, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, michael.foord |
| 2009年04月02日 19:22:44 | pitrou | link | issue2578 messages |
| 2009年04月02日 19:22:44 | pitrou | create |
|