Message85221
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger, skip.montanaro |
| Date |
2009年04月02日.16:40:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00010726031 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<ca471dc20904020939u7b75aebbg4679fa3aac508bf@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1238675803.13.0.46679608307.issue2578@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Bikeshedding a bit - the 'assertGreaterEqual' and 'assertLessEqual'
> method names grate on me a little. My brain has to do a double take in
> order to correctly insert the implied 'Or'. This reaction is made worse
> when these two methods are juxtaposed with all the other "assert*Equal"
> methods like DictEqual, ListEqual, SetEqual etc.
>
> Would it be possible to lengthen these specific names to the more
> explicit "assertGreaterOrEqual" and "assertLessOrEqual"?
No, please. Get used to it. Maybe it helps if you realize the parallel
with '__ge__'? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年04月02日 16:40:03 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, purcell, ncoghlan, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, michael.foord |
| 2009年04月02日 16:40:00 | gvanrossum | link | issue2578 messages |
| 2009年04月02日 16:40:00 | gvanrossum | create |
|