Message84569
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
carmiac, davidfraser, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, tim.peters, tlesher |
| Date |
2009年03月30日.15:53:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0028625226 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1238428406.63.0.520650478421.issue1674032@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Looking at this, I think this change is fine. The _Event class itself
holds the condition that it's checking for, and the is_set() method
doesn't acquire the lock, so there's no reason to prefer
e.wait()
if e.is_set():
GOT_IT()
over
if e.wait():
GOT_IT()
IOW Tim's reasoning in #1175933 for rejecting a similar change to
_Condition.wait() doesn't apply here. I think we can go ahead without
waiting for Tim to confirm this. |
|