Message84379
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger |
| Date |
2009年03月29日.12:00:09 |
| SpamBayes Score |
6.475243e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1238328091.6448.2.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1238291212.4.0.487859611052.issue2578@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I -did- add casing for the type to the main assertEqual method so it may
> make sense to make the new type specific methods private so that they're
> not part of the public API (ie: I agree with pitrou that it seems
> pointless).
Well, that's my own aesthetical feeling. Others may disagree :)
But I think the public API should stay reasonably compact, so that unit
testing doesn't incur a lot of cognitive overhead. |
|