Message84252
| Author |
cdavid |
| Recipients |
cdavid, loewis |
| Date |
2009年03月27日.05:06:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00046494056 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1238130362.62.0.059462460856.issue4709@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think compiling python itself with it would be quite difficult - I
have never attempted it. My 'scenario' is building extensions against
the official python for amd64 on windows.
The quickest way to test the patch would be as follows:
- take a native toolchain (by native, I mean runs on and target 64 bits
windows subsystem - I have not tested cross compilation, or even using
32 bits toolchain on WoW). The one from equations.com is recent and runs
well:
http://www.equation.com/servlet/equation.cmd?call=fortran
- builds a hello-world like python extension from the command line:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/MicrosoftToolchainSupport (I am
sorry, the wiki page is bit messy, I will clean it up).
Since we use our own distutils extensions in numpy, I don't know how
much is needed for support at the stdlib distutils level. If that's
something which sounds interesting to python itself, I am willing to add
support in python proper for mingw-w64. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年03月27日 05:06:02 | cdavid | set | recipients:
+ cdavid, loewis |
| 2009年03月27日 05:06:02 | cdavid | set | messageid: <1238130362.62.0.059462460856.issue4709@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年03月27日 05:06:01 | cdavid | link | issue4709 messages |
| 2009年03月27日 05:06:00 | cdavid | create |
|