Message83679
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2009年03月17日.13:47:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.4430435e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1237297649.61.0.225264594791.issue5353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
This issue was discussed two years ago in this thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-December/588224.html
Most of the messages under that subject are noise about politeness or
lack thereof (including a post by the submitter of this issue trying to
get people to be reasonable!), but an actual patch was posted as well:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-December/588377.html
The patch addresses only one object type, but does demonstrate a pattern
that might be usable in general. A concern was raised about the
generality of the function proposed, as well as the performance
implications of calling it.
I have not tried to apply the patch to the current trunk, but from a
quick look it doesn't seem like the source has changed much. Since the
problem turns out to be a lot less trivial than it seems like it should
be, the patch is a good reference in any case. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2009年03月17日 13:47:29 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| 2009年03月17日 13:47:29 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1237297649.61.0.225264594791.issue5353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009年03月17日 13:47:28 | r.david.murray | link | issue5353 messages |
| 2009年03月17日 13:47:27 | r.david.murray | create |
|